Home > Online Clinic News > Sildenafil's Impact on Fat Cells Studied

Latest News

by Robert MacKay, Friday, 25 January 2013 | Categories: Viagra

Treating obesity is one of the largest challenges to modern society, and both scientific and unscientific methods for losing weight are often mentioned in mainstream media. One unconventional scientific finding that has gained attention recently is the suggestion that sildenafil (the key ingredient in Viagra) could be useful to treat obesity in humans. In this article we take a critical approach to the study behind these findings.

The study, which was published in Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, was an animal study that used both mice and mice cells to investigate what effect a signalling messenger called cGMP would have on fat tissue. It is important to note that the study was not exclusively related to the effect of sildenafil on fat tissue, and other experiments within this publication considered alternative aspects of cGMP on the fat cells. With regards to the sildenafil experiments it was hypothesised that if sildenafil could effectively block an enzyme known to break down cGMP, then the increased levels of cGMP could be considered to contribute to potential changes in the fat cells.

Overall, the sildenafil experiment lasted seven days. During this period the mice were split into two groups, with one group being given 12mg/kg sildenafil and the other group being given a placebo containing 0.9% salt. These treatments were administered on a daily basis. Once the treatments were finished, the researchers compared changes in weight and body composition before and after the treatment between the groups. In addition to that the researchers also looked at tissue samples taken from the mice’s abdominal region. The key findings indicated that the weight and body composition was not affected in either group. However, the observation of the samples of abdominal cells suggested that, for the mice in the sildenafil group, the white fat cells had changed to have some features of brown adipose tissue (known for their ability to generate heat from fat). Based on this, the researchers argued that sildenafil could contribute to “browning” of white fat cells, which could be useful for considering obesity treatments.

Although this study outlined an intriguing hypothesis for the underlying mechanism of browning, it is clear that the many limitations of the study demonstrated that the findings are too small and too recent to warrant the conclusions. The fact that the findings cannot be extrapolated to humans at this stage is obvious given that this was an animal study that had a very short duration. Similarly, several factors such as whether all the mice were obese, ages of the mice and levels of stress tolerance that could have contributed to different reactions between the groups were not specified, thus making it challenging to rule out alternative explanations.

What stood out the most for us when reading the article was the absence of two distinctions in particular. The first one was the researchers’ failure to make a distinction between browning cells and brown cells when discussing their results, thus making it difficult to know whether their ability to create heat from fat comes from an identical process and is comparable to other studies of brown cells. Consequently, this omission led to the study’s main strength of explaining an underlying relationship between sildenafil and fat cells becoming subject to more questions than answers. The second distinction was the fact that the researchers gave the mice very high doses of sildenafil, which were much higher than the current doses prescribed for erectile dysfunction treatment in humans. This, of course, made us wonder for whom they were designing this treatment and where the value of the finding lies.

If high doses are likely to be considered unsuitable for humans, then they are even more unlikely to be a prescribed by most clinicians. While the findings in this study can raise hope, it is important to know that they are far from being established facts in the scientific community and even further from being considered safe and reliable treatments in the clinical community.





 
We use cookies on this website. By using this site, you agree that we may store and access cookies on your device. Find out more Close